News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257269
Next 10
Followers 24
Posts 2252
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2007

Re: genisi post# 113332

Wednesday, 01/26/2011 11:57:53 AM

Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:57:53 AM

Post# of 257269
<<That's my understanding of the § 271(e)(1) of the 35 U.S.C. namely the Bolar exception provision>>

In fact TEVA's answer cites 271e)(1) as an affirmative defense. I set forth 271(e)(1) below.

At the risk of displaying complete ignorance as well as laziness, this subsection seems to be limited to genetic manipulation. Is that what is used in manufacturing Lovenox?

(e)

(1) It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention (other than a new animal drug or veterinary biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Act of March 4, 1913) which is primarily manufactured using recombinant DNA, recombinant RNA, hybridoma technology, or other processes involving site specific genetic manipulation techniques) solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today