InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5219
Posts 24047
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: andrewjoseph post# 22807

Monday, 01/24/2011 9:12:06 AM

Monday, January 24, 2011 9:12:06 AM

Post# of 30337
andrewjoseph, with your non-finite thoughts...

You speak as if the thoughts you are posting about here with ZLUS are finite. I am simply saying that your thoughts are no more finite than mines or anyone else's thoughts shared here about ZLUS, but yet you post as if your thoughts are the only thoughts to be considered. I'm saying that it's fair for one to consider your thoughts (although I don’t agree with them), but it is also fair for others to understand why your thoughts are not applicable to ZLUS.

You speak of financing for the wells, but apparently, they have a plan that has not been released considering their growth while reducing debt. Something good is happening on that end where having money to move forward with their projects is not an issue. Just because we don't details about such doesn't make it an issue either.

As for the percentages for certain ventures... just because certain details were not mentioned doesn't mean to automatically assume the worst.

As for your timeline, just because the company has not met your timeline for when they should announce certain details about the operations of their well does not mean to assume the lower of the amount of oil to be generated. Meeting your timeline has absolutely nothing to do with whether ZLUS will report 50 to 100 barrels of oil per day (Bopd) or some smaller amount.

As for not being the landowner, that part too has surprising gone over your head. We knew that from the very beginning and those thoughts were clearly discussed. I can't believe you make these comments and yet have appeared to have totally ignored answers posted to your thoughts/questions.

I fully understand that whether you are drilling in Alaska or Arkansas, the process is very similar. That was my point to you, but what you didn't understand was the point where the process for the person on the receiving end of profits/money is different when the company is publicly trading where shares of equity are owned versus a private oil transaction. Sorry, that difference is clear as day that such are two different arms of growth for a company to being a gain for a person.

As for picking up wells from the foreclosed properties, you stated that… anyone and everyone would have snatched these up years ago if they were worth having – provided they don't have some secret connection. … Well, that’s exactly what we are saying is that there just might be some secret connection that none of us here is aware of that they will be able to pick up a group of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 wells or so due to properties being foreclosed with already existing wells on them. The Rainbolts been in this industry for the past hundred years or so and I believe that such carry more weight than what is apparent… for now. Again, you know nothing more as a fact than the rest of us here sharing our thoughts.

Time will prevail to prove who is right or wrong. You have simply assumed the worst for all of those details you have no confirmed answer for. I am simply saying that because you do not know the answers to how certain things are getting done or how certain things will be done in the future, doesn't mean that the sky is falling as you try to portray on one hand, but yet say that you want to buy in at the .0028 per share range give or take. That picture is respectfully, just a little cloudy to me.

v/r
Sterling

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.