"Then on the other end, we have you doing the exact same last ditch effort on a message board to try and push your agenda. Painting the kettle black eh."
My agenda? It seems my agenda is shared with the IPPS, Concord Steam, OCA and PUC staff testimony. Higher wood prices, and a significantly over market PPA isn't good for rate payers, isn't good for significantly more jobs already created in the north country for decades within the other biomass facilities. It's quite simple really. If those plants close, which is highly likely upon significantly higher wood chip price the net effect is significantly fewer jobs with Laidlaw and a NEGATIVE net result percentage for the State's 2025 initiative. Perhaps this is why testimony on behalf of the PUC isn't even referring to this as free trade anymore. (Now being questioned as fair trade) Digi, need to ask you a question. Why aren't you reading testimony as it becomes available as part of your due diligence? You may want to view what shows up on the docket between today and late tomorrow my friend. This is anything but a last ditch effort on my part to do anything other than provide information at this point in time. I already know for a fact that I'm fine with whatever outcome occurs at this point. Already received every protection known to mankind for the city of Berlin, just needed to gain protection for the rate payer and the smaller biomass companies, and now know that protection is inevitable, or politics will rear its head to the point where an appeal becomes a foolish risk on the part of politicians. I'm just waiting to see if our local politicians continue to go down this foolish path as it will bite them is the a$$ with an appeal in the grand finale if they choose to be so careless.
