Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:29:24 AM
I believe the answers lie more towards understanding the geo-political relationships with not only the companies involved but the countries for which they represent.
It is difficult to grasp decisions that are made by host countries when they could be based on past experiences with other country's foreign policies or perceived objectives.
So in short, in order to answer your question we would need to weight the cost, risk and reward of each company. What are we gaining monetary value versus the political risk of both contries involved, perceived positives/negatives of countries involved with host government/population, likelyhood of change in future foreign policies etc.
Obviously, companies objectives or desires to work with easy or complex fields gets thrown in the mix.
I believe the exit of the companies you mentioned, was due to an evaluation of the above and their conclusion that it was not worth their while for the potential monetary gain vs risks (all, not just production).
Cheers
Brez
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM