I mainly only looked at those 4 paragraphs since it really benefits the preferreds initially. I would say Brian Rodent has an acceptable resolution to the ones I posted, HOWEVER, the question is how many are on the "Trust Advisory Board" and who are the other members and are they "independent"???
If we only have one member, and we are out numbered, then it wouldn't fair nor reasonable.
While skimming the document, I don't recall seeing anything on NOLs for 2011.
As for everything else, I really didn't go through it much other than what i have posted. Rodent only addressed the Court's issues. Whether it is acceptable, we will have to wait and find out.
In my opinion, Rodent is trying to back door the changes.modification to the POR that was denied rather than have an official revision/amended POR to put it up for vote.
EC needs to get their PJS numbers up for their completing POR soon....
Just my opinion though.