Very well thought out post, IP ... it contains information that could have only have been gained by either being in the court room, reading a transcript or talking to someone who was in the court room. It sounds like the latter because of the interpretations and the weight given to certain segments of the testimony and evidence.
It is certainly easy to understand your slant and I'm sure a lot of other people would develop the same opinions given the information you apparently were given. However, there are other factors which play into the overall scheme of things that would also give validity other conclusions.
The CYGX/Waldroff license needs to be renegotiated ... that is very apparent. However, the existence of the Waldroff/AVGI license is equally in need of renegotiation. This is where the difficulty level shoots up exponentially. Can you say, "CLASH OF EGOS?" Waldroff will find himself caught between two forces that are more powerful, vengeful and illogical than a woman scorned or raging teenage hormones.
Several others have alluded to the most worrisome line in your post:
It is possible that CYGX has another potential licensee and wanted the field of use back to make a better deal.
IF that is the case, will we see the same strategy re-utilized again and again? I hope you're wrong about that. Volumes could be written concerning that manner of strategy.
Anyway, thanks for the thoughtful post of your conclusions.
AI
