InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 287
Posts 21275
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 09/16/2009

Re: charger_sbee post# 106685

Monday, 01/17/2011 12:10:02 PM

Monday, January 17, 2011 12:10:02 PM

Post# of 111729
The incentive would be to prevent large shareholders from dumping their stock causing this to go to no Bid, which prevents the further liquidation of shares for raising money. They are in fact selling change here, a different CEO, the removal of a bad image associated with BEHL. They even go to the point of selling change is already in progress with the latest PR. It is all about emotion in the Pinks, rarely ever fundamentals, and so making shareholders think the old management team is gone and a new beginning is in progress is a sales pitch. Once again I have asked for who this person is and nobody can provide anything other than a name, so like it is stated you are currently only sold a name and that is all. You have no idea who this Mike Burton is, what his credentials are, what experience he has, what motivation he has for taking over a dead end pink sheet stock that is in debt.

The sales pitch is simple, new management, new business plan and moving on. By the way people change their names all the time to start over in fact I do believe Hollywood is nothing more an a series of stage names that have led to success. Corporate America changes names all the time to disassociate poor images all the time. You may say it does nothing but here in Pinkyland it is all about changing such basic items in hopes that the old will be forgotten and a new crop believers comes along to start the whole process over again. I guess you better get to changing your name because it can be logically supported that name changes do have an impact on success. Ironic the CEO of BEHL did this also, so maybe you should ask him what degree of success it allowed him by changing his name.