Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Santa Barbara Broker]

here's another clue jerry .. *retail* isn't known for shorting .. and there is no doubt imo that whichever *entity* shorted EXPH (it was actually done via those *curious trades* between those 2 well orchestrated runs in 2009) has now created a rather interesting paradox 'cos while the pps is indeed cellar boxed .. *volume* has to show now 2 X per month .. b4 the 15th and b4 the eom

I would like a single, precise and clear statement of exactly what this means. In MY opinion, having read this constantly adjusting information about Expo Holding's situation for over a year, it would appear a single paragraph in clear language devoid of pretense would sum the entire thing up. Is THIS what the current situation is with EXPH in your opinion?

"Expo Holdings, Inc. is a public company run by honest, hard working individuals with great integrity. In the recent economic recession, they ran on difficult times and decided to sell shares to get through a tough patch. Once the dilution began, clandestine "entities" took notice and decided to exploit the company by shorting massive quantities of shares and driving the price down resulting in JD Brown having to issue more and more shares to achieve the same cash returns. The short "entities" did this all with the sole, unwavering intent of driving the share price to zero, collapsing the firm and never having to "cover" (in essence) resulting in 100% pure profit minus any fees."

That is all I seem to be able to derive from your posts concerning the company. I would just like a confirmation. Of course this leaves the explanation of the dozens of zealous "insiders" clutching their common shares tightly completely unexplained. Certainly they understand that dilution at the rate being performed by JD Brown renders this retention of common shares utterly futile? Retention by insiders of any shares outside of the preferred shares likely held by Brown, Harrs and perhaps a few other(s) required to override normal majority rulings by common shareholders would appear to be pointless at this juncture if the above premise has been correctly interpreted. I just want to try and clear things up once and for all. TIA. IMHO.

SBB