InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 7117
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2010

Re: deet49 post# 18661

Thursday, 01/13/2011 6:58:57 PM

Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:58:57 PM

Post# of 91121
I answered this in posts today. See my last posts.

I don't know if there is a Mexican equivalent to the Canadian standard you mention and I've never personally seen that standard used for anything except gold and silver companies-maybe it is but I haven't seen it for copper and iron.

As my posts indicate ,when you have visible red iron at every surface elevation in varied mountain topography, w the hills painted red, that is a good indication the iron is consistent through out,in addition to previous deep trenching. You don't have that advantage w a plateau.
Look at a map of Northern Baja mining concessions and you will see essentially the entire backbone of N.Baja-the mountain part that includes CWRN- is covered by mining concessions.

CWRN's Baja 14-the mine in productuon-is surrounded by other mining concessions(e.g the private company Navia-spelling?) because the larger geological strata is known to contain iron.

CWRN estimates so much loose iron they estimate 2 years production w 16 hr days before they have to blast. If they had only 2 years iron that would be their problem-w the millions in mostly new equipment-not your problem-right?

Navria(spelling?) estimates so much iron they were going to construct their own port roughly west(if I remember right-you can google them and see their grand plans on their website) of Baja 14.