![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:09:53 PM
If I put these 2 quotes together
We are looking for roughly
2 to 4% Total REEs
25 to 50% of that should be HREEs
2% being the low side but ok
and 4% being Good or Better
Also the HREEs have been said to be very important
we want a minimum of the total REEs to be Hrees in these %s
25% on the lowerside
50% being really Good
As always, width of the Intersection of the minerals is Very important..
10 meters is pretty good I assume
the more under 10 the less good (lol)
unless percentages are to the Highest ends...
Now, what I would like to see, which is based on what I have been seeing in the REE market would be:
Total REEs of about 2 wt%, with HREEs making up more than 30% of this number. And of course a thick intersection would be nice (> 10 m is not asking to much) ;)
"good" minable REE values would be above 4% total REEs with at least a quarter to a half of that total concentration being HREEs
This is how the PR reported The REEs
Hole RR10-02 intersected variably altered and mineralized peralkaline felsic volcanic rocks throughout the upper 245 meters of the 344 meter long hole. Initial ICP analytical results indicated elevated lanthanum and cerium through several sections; these, along with other selected sections of the drill hole were sent for a complete suite of rare earth and associated elements. Results have been received for the upper section of the drill hole from 30 to 40.1m. The analyses indicate a 7.5m interval from 30.0 to 37.5m having elevated rare earth elements and zircon, returning a weighted average of 0.164% TREO (including yttrium) consisting of 0.113% LREO and 0.051% HREO (including yttrium). The results also returned 0.268% zirconium dioxide, 0.039% Nb2O5 (niobium oxide) and 0.022% rubidium. A table showing all analyses will be posted to our website in the near future. Additional samples are being analyzed for the rare earth and associated elements from other deeper sections of the hole and will be reported when received.
They do not report it in such simple terms
The 7.5m width is smaller than 10..
So what percentages do you need for that width
lanthanum and cerium
zircon
0.164% TREO
0.113% LREO
0.051% HREO
0.268% zirconium dioxide
0.039% Nb205
0.022% rubidium
This is where its gets tough to decypher
Any help with what we are looking for and what is what
The upper half (REEs and HREEs above) is easy to figure
The way it will be reported, not so easy
TIA To all the Geos
Recent KATX News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/20/2024 11:58:38 AM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM