InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 599
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/23/2009

Re: Dayton009 post# 11755

Thursday, 01/13/2011 2:25:52 PM

Thursday, January 13, 2011 2:25:52 PM

Post# of 72584
Historic trends have shown that all PR's in the past 6 months have had a negative impact on OTOW

The downtrend shouldn't be 100% attributed to the PR's being issued; that poor logic could also be used to say 'oh, if it wasn't for the PR's the down trend would be 10 times worse!'

Both premises are weak. I would stay away from making an association between the trend and the PR's.

The PR's themselves are their own seperate topic. My opionion is that they're fluff. The main ideas behind them are good, but there are very few actual facts provided supporting them, which is what makes them fluff. Yeah great, we're opening shop in DR, fine, but what's the projected revenue stream. If a projection hasn't been made, then the capital investment made towards entering that market should not have been made. Therefore, if Val has any idea what he's doing, then that projection should have be made. This is just an example of what a solid PR would contain, not just some announcement that is very difficult to verify independently.

Also, in regards to the stock's price, notice how most stock scams are related to doing business outside of the country? That's because you can't easily verify its claims. Take that into consideration next time you wonder to yourself why the price is what it is. I'm not saying OTOW is a scam, just telling you what others are thinking in general regarding companies doing business outside of the country and just 'happen' to be a pink sheet. Most people equate pinks with scams anyways, otow's operations being outside of the country doesn't help it too much in regards to this matter.

Another words: it's a pink; seeing a pop and drop shouldn't be a surprise.

Those who love us never really leave us