InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 992
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2000

Re: learning as I go post# 82

Wednesday, 01/12/2011 11:30:03 PM

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:30:03 PM

Post# of 223
The original Plan for reorganization was filed on 11-19-10 DE # 339. That Plan included reference to the Assumption of Leases or Executory Contracts (Ashley)

On 12-3-10 JENNQ filed a Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 362

On 12-17-10 JENNQ filed an Amended Plan DE # 384, 385, again referencing the Assumption...

On 12-22-10 Another Amended Plan DE # 399, 401, again, referencing the Assumption...

So, Ashley had THREE opportunities to see what the plan included and like I said, they included the Assumption AND they were aware of the Motion to Assume Leases...filed on 12-3.

Then, on 12-23-10, JENNQ filed another Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 402 (not quite sure why they filed it again)

It wasn't until 1-4-11 that Ashley actually filed an objection and they objected to DE # 362, not the most recent one filed on 12-23 DE # 402

In my opinion, that just begs the question, why did Ashley wait so long to object and why are they just now objecting to the FIRST motion when there is a SECOND, more recent one, they should be objecting to. They were aware of JENNQ's intentions since 11-19-10....


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.