The original Plan for reorganization was filed on 11-19-10 DE # 339. That Plan included reference to the Assumption of Leases or Executory Contracts (Ashley)
On 12-3-10 JENNQ filed a Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 362
On 12-17-10 JENNQ filed an Amended Plan DE # 384, 385, again referencing the Assumption...
On 12-22-10 Another Amended Plan DE # 399, 401, again, referencing the Assumption...
So, Ashley had THREE opportunities to see what the plan included and like I said, they included the Assumption AND they were aware of the Motion to Assume Leases...filed on 12-3.
Then, on 12-23-10, JENNQ filed another Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 402 (not quite sure why they filed it again)
It wasn't until 1-4-11 that Ashley actually filed an objection and they objected to DE # 362, not the most recent one filed on 12-23 DE # 402
In my opinion, that just begs the question, why did Ashley wait so long to object and why are they just now objecting to the FIRST motion when there is a SECOND, more recent one, they should be objecting to. They were aware of JENNQ's intentions since 11-19-10....