Washington Mutual Preferred fka WAMPQ

[ptolomeo]

THJMW contradicted herself. GS reasonable or not?

From her own Opinion:
http://ghostofwamu.com/documents/08-12229/08-12229-6528.pdf


Page 2
Although concluding that the Global Settlement is fair and reasonable, the Court finds that the Debtors’ Plan is not confirmable unless the deficiencies explained herein are corrected.

Page 20
The Court agrees with the Plan Objectors: each part of the settlement must be evaluated to determine whether the settlement as a whole is reasonable.


So, on page 2 she says that the GS is reasonable and on page 20 she needs "each part of the settlement evaluated" to tell if it's reasonable, then is it or isn't it reasonable?

I don't get it.