InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 45596
Next 10
Followers 8
Posts 901
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2003

Re: None

Sunday, 03/27/2005 5:32:22 PM

Sunday, March 27, 2005 5:32:22 PM

Post# of 45596
ECONOMIC TERRORISTS AGAINST THEIR OWN NATION


By: terminator2u
27 Mar 2005, 03:42 PM EST
Msg. 869393 of 869491
Jump to msg. #
I AM NOT BASHING ROGER GLENN OR ANYBODY.

I DO NOT DISPUTE THAT GLENN PROBABLY HELPED CMKX IN PERHAPS MANY WAYS

I AM SEEKING TO INTERPRET THE PR - THAT IS ALL - SPECIFICALLY, TO INTERPRET WHAT MAHUE THINKS BASED ON WHAT HE SAID.

I THINK ITS IMPORTANT WHAT MAHUE THINKS SINCE HE IS IN CONTROL - WHETHER HE IS RIGHT OR NOT IS ANOTHER ISSUE.

I AM FOCUSING ON WHAT MAHUE ACTUALLY SAID IN THE PR

Quote:
Past professional guidance has left a void which prevented the Company's ability to prepare complete and accurate periodic reports under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act," stated Maheu.





I DO NOT BELIEVE HE WOULD SAY SOMETHING HE DID NOT ALSO THINK TO BE TRUE (ALLOWING HE COULD BE WRONG, HOWEVER - LOL)

I WOULD HOPE THAT Y'ALL COULD DISTINGUISH BETWEEN WHAT JAWZ THINKS OF ROGER AND WHAT MAHUE THINKS OF ROGER - BUT PERHAPS THAT IS ASKING TOO MUCH

As I said, I WOULD LIKE TO BE WRONG that Iron Bob is blaming Roger Glenn for being sloppy - but nobody has said anything to convice me otherwise - yet!

OBJECTIONS TO THE THESIS ABOVE:

{"I believe they are refering to "Past professional guidance", as in, before Roger's time."}

{"I think the void was created by past accountants (or lack thereof)."}

{"Robert Maheu is not blaiming Roger Glenn. He's blaiming the legal counsel in 2003. Glenn wasn't our counsel until June 4th of 2004. "}

Mahue in the PR said:

IF HE WAS REFERING TO THE CREW FROM 2003 OR ANYONE ELSE BEFORE R GLENN, AND DID NOT INTEND TO INCLUDE ROGER, THEN WHY DID MAHUE ALSO SAY:

Quote:

The error in the 2003 filing "was discovered by CMKX's new securities counsel in February 2005."





IE, MAHUE'S NEW LEGAL COUNSEL FOUND IT - NOT ROGER GLENN.

IT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MAHUE IS HERE BLOWING HIS OWN HORN HERE.

"HEY !! MY BOYS HERE IN VEGAS FOUND THE PROBLEM !!

NOT THAT GUY FROM NEW YORK CITY !!"

CHORUS: "NEW YORK CITY !!" (boos and hisses)

IT IS PRECISLY

{"the magnitude of expertise that someone like Roger Glenn brings to the table "}

WHICH MAKES THIS AN ISSUE, BECAUSE

Quote:THE GUY WHO WROTE THE BOOK ON SARBANES-OXLEY COMPLIANCE AND FORMERLY WORKED FOR THE SEC IN COMPLIANCE SHOULD SURELY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO "CATCH" ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT WAS NOT KOSHER WITH CMKX.

IMHO, IRON BOB IS ACCUSING ROGER OF LEAVING GAPING VOIDS THAT WOULD TRIP UP CMKX WHEN THE SEC TOOK ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION.




THE ONLY CAVEAT I CAN THINK OF IS IF ROGER IDENTIFIED THE PROBLEMS BUT THEN LEFT THE "FIXING" OF THEM TO OTHERS.

BUT THE MOST RECENT PR CLEARLY DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THAT POSSIBILITY - BECAUSE

Quote:

The error in the 2003 filing "was discovered by CMKX's new securities counsel in February 2005."





=====================================================

on 03/25/2005 at 21:21:03, JohnnyChristian wrote:Jaws - Do you really want to go with the theory that RG was a mole for the SEC?





AT LEAST MY THEORY RESPECTS THE EXPERTISE OF ROGER GLENN.

YOURS DOES NOT.

YOUR THEORY WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE THAT THE BEST LEGAL TEAM MONEY COULD BUY TRIED BUT FAILED TO DISCOVER SOMETHING THAT THE BEUROCRATS AT THE SEC WOULD FIND TO COMPLICATE LIFE FOR CMKX.

SO - TRY AS HE DID, ROGER WAS NOT AS SMART AS THE ROBOTS AT THE SEC

TRY AS HE DID, ROGER GLENN & EDWARDS & ANGELL JUST "MISSED" SOSMETHING - "OOP$$$ !!!"



YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE THAT CMKX IS SO SCREWED UP THAT EVEN ROGER GLENN COULD NOT SOLVE ALL THE POBLEMS AFTER 9 MONTHS

GOD ONLY KNOWS HOW MUCH THE BILL FROM EDWARDS & ANGELL WAS !!!

THAT CMKX WAS SO HOPELESS, THAT GLENN JUST THREW UP HIS HANDS IN DISGUST AND WALKED AWAY

NO THANK YOU !!!

BTW YOUR CONCLUSION IS ALSO INVALID:
Quote:

now it means we have nothing and this game is over.





PRECISELY BECAUSE

Quote:

If he (Roger) was a mole and had 9 months to see everything then that would mean he knew the valuation and if we had anything substantial. If SEC waits until they get their mole out to do what there are doing.





THE LOGIC OF THE "ROGER WAS A MOLE" THEORY IMPELS ONE TO CONCLUDE THAT THE SEC HAS INDEED DISCOVERED THAT CMKX HAS LOTS OF STUFF THAT IS INDEED EXTREMELY SUBSTANTIAL.

OTHERWISE, WHY WOULD THE SEC CONTINUE TO TRY TO KEEP THIS INFO FROM THE PUBLIC?

- BY TELLING USCA & CMKX TO STAY "MUM' AS EARLY AS THE HALLOWEEN VEGAS PARTY?

- BY SEEKING PERHAPS TO REVOKE THEIR REGISTRATION IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE FILING OF DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL VALUATION ?

ETC
ETC
MANY MORE ITEMS COULD BE ENUMERATED - - -

THE "FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION" IS DUE TO CMKX COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC DIRECTIVES!!! (AS WELL AS MOB THREATS)

THE SEC TOLD CMKX/USCA TO STAY MUM 6 MONTHS AGO TO MOTIVATE SHAREHOLDER WRATH AT THE COMPANY FOR KEEPING THEM IN THE DARK - WHEN IT WAS THE SEC DEMANDING THIS, AND NOT THE COMPANY, ALL ALONG !!! WHY? SO THEY WOULD SELL, OF COURSE!

THE MOB EVEN MADE DEATH THREATS AGAINST URBAN & OTHERS BEFORE THE HALLOWEEN PARTY TO ENFORCE THIS GAG ORDER - EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT IN CMKX' OWN BEST INTEREST !!!

WHO KEPT THE LEASH, ER THE GAGG, ON CMKX FROM JUNE UNTIL THE SEC SUSPENSION OF USCA AT HALLOWEEN

D ROGER GLENN, THAT'S WHO !!!

THINK ABOUT IT !!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:

now it means we have nothing and this game is over.





ON THE CONTRARY

IT IS ONLY LOGICAL TO CONCLUDE

IN LIGHT OF THE DOCUMENTED HUMONGOUS SHORT POSITION - WHICH HAS RAISED THE OS TO 1.1 TRILLION (USING THE DTCC-SUPPLIED OWN RATIO FOR THE CIM DIVIDEND)

THAT THE SEC IS SUPPRESSING THE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THAT WOULD VERIFY THAT IT IS NOT SERVING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND THE THE ONLY "INVESTORS" IT SERVES ARE THE BILLIONAIRES LIKE THE EVIL OFF-SHORE HEDGE FUND KING PIN SHORT CMKX.

YOU APPLICATION IS ALSO BASED ON A NEGATIVE ASSUMPTION:

Quote:

If you do (believe Glenn was an SEC mole) then you should have sold all your shares.





YOU ASSUME THAT THE SEC WILL WIN.

EVIL TRIUMPHS, CRIMINAL NAKED SHORTS STAY RICH AT OUR EXPENSE.

I AM MORE OPEN ON THAT OUTCOME MYSELF.

IN FACT, AS I HAVE LOGICALLY OFFERED BEFORE,

THE SEC CHAIRMAN GETTING ROASTED BY THE SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE LAST WEEK

WAS A WARNING SHSOT TO JORGE SORRY AND ALL THE OTHER EVIL NAKED SHORTS

THAT DUBYA IS COMING AFTER THEM

AND THAT THE SEC WILL NOT STOP THE FORCES OF JUSTICE - IN ORDER

TO ACHIEVE THE PRESIDENT'S MISSION OBJECTIVE OF PRIVATIZING SOCIALIST INSECURITY

I THINK DUBYA WILL PREVAIL OVER THOSE IN THE SEC WHO ARE CORRUPTED TRAITORS, SERVING THE ECONOMIC TERRORISTS AGAINST THEIR OWN NATION DURING WAR TIME.

IF IT WERE ANY COUNTRY OTHER THAN AMERICA THEY WERE BETRAYING, THEY WOULD BE SUMMARILY SHOT IN THE HEAD.

WHICH IS I'M SURE WHAT THE MOB HAS ALSO SUGGESTED COULD HAPPEN TO THEM IF THEY DO NOT CONTINUE TO SERVE THE FORCES OF EVIL.

BUT EVEN THE MOB CAN NOT PREVAIL OVER THE FULLY ROUSED WRATH OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

THANK GOD .

THAT'S WHY THE EVIL ONES ARE OFF SHORE TO BEGIN WITH -

BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL LOSE.
http://1millionaire.proboards31.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1111780516

Check my FAVORITE LINKS in my profile:
______________________________________________________

NOTE: THESE ARE OPINIONS ONLY. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION TO BUY OR SELL SECURITIES, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.