Health Discovery Corp (HDVY)

[adognamedcharlie]

ACCIPTOR: Thank you for your post. But you still did not answer YES or NO.
I for one was NOT a poster, as you state, saying it was "OK" because of the language--since that language is "standard, or boilerplate" language and is in virtually EVERY stock issuance by EVERY coompany (hence, it is boilerplate). Be that as it may, my question to you still stands: DO YOU HAVE any OTHER FACTS or NEW FACTS to offer us that the company is "issuing shares to pay for its expenses" as you claim, or are you just venting. If it is that latter, then please just say so. That is all I am asking here.

By the way, start up companies, as I am sure you know, will sometimes pay vendors/suppliers in stock because the companies are "our of cash" or "conserving cash"---That would clearly qualify as "issuing stock to pay corporate expenses"....which would indicate a much more dire situation. But HDVY's situation of registering shares (as required by law)that were issued to warrant holders who converted their warrants (options) into shares as they were entitled to do is entirely different. I am sure you see the difference, don't you?

Your posts make it sound like you have facts that we don't possess---so I am just trying to find out what they are. If you have no more facts, so be it.
JUST SAY YES I have additional facts/information or NO I do not.
I just ask you to answer one way or the other for the benefit of all of us posters. Thank you.