InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 186
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/25/2010

Re: enemem post# 35371

Friday, 01/07/2011 10:34:37 AM

Friday, January 07, 2011 10:34:37 AM

Post# of 47489
"...a move to take the company private."
That would explain much. They are already behaving like a privately held company from a P.R. perspective. The delays in releasing SA are by now clearly the result of ongoing negotiations with an entity, perhaps one whose goal it is to privatize the technology. In the absence of previous methods of funding, why stay public? You have no benefits, and all the regulatory hassles to contend with, and the legal and accounting expenses, not to mention those pesky shareholder people.
I know it's all speculation, but I'd be interested in any thoughts the board might have that would contradict the logic of my last paragraph.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News