I thought that ABX and PDG have a much greater hedging exposure than NEM, the latter's exposure is from a recent acquisition (and that exposure is being slowly unwound?). If one hold gold stocks in the hope of $330 be taken out, a company hedged three years into the future (like I believe ABX is) will not derive great benefit from such a jump. That author does not address that issue, but that must be one of the reason that the market gives NEM a higher premium of NAV. Am I missing something?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.