InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 72136
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 1670
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2010

Re: None

Tuesday, 01/04/2011 2:31:08 AM

Tuesday, January 04, 2011 2:31:08 AM

Post# of 72136
In the attorney letter I find 9. to be intersting...

Is this suggesting Val prepared the financial statements himself?
I thought a firm was hired to do that. Which begs the next question...why is the last sentence in paragraph 9. stating "The financial statements have not been audited"?

I thought we were all waiting for the "audited" financials. I thought that was the requirement to uplist (removal of Yield sign) with Pink Sheets?

I might be looking at this the wrong way, or maybe I am not understnading the purpose of this attorney letter. But unaudited is what it is, which is not what I thought had been done almost 6 months ago now.

Any thoughts?