InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 153
Posts 12276
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/02/2007

Re: Johnik post# 86595

Monday, 01/03/2011 9:17:13 PM

Monday, January 03, 2011 9:17:13 PM

Post# of 312016
oh dear-- guess it is good I did not respond right away...

Sorry jimmenknee, but I suspect I'm going to get some roundabout, indirect answer from you, instead of a concrete assertion. I hope my suspicions prove incorrect, as you truly are one of my favorite "skeptics" on this board.



What kind of an assertion would you like? The dates, with the initial sale of the PP occurring first and the AGM following after, are irrefutable-- agreed?

So if during the AGM there was talk of the possibility of a PP using future tense-- as your post clearly indicates -- is that not the equivalent of lying? If not, then careful parsing and semantics must be employed-- no?

Are we not then quibbling over the difference between deceit and lie?