InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 111
Posts 11523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2006

Re: puppydotcom post# 87287

Monday, 01/03/2011 6:28:48 PM

Monday, January 03, 2011 6:28:48 PM

Post# of 312016
Strategic lawsuit against public participation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Part of a series on
Censorship

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.[1]

The typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat. The difficulty, of course, is that plaintiffs do not present themselves to the Court admitting that their intent is to censor, intimidate or silence their critics. Hence, the difficulty in drafting SLAPP legislation, and in applying it, is to craft an approach which affords an early termination to invalid abusive suits, without denying a legitimate day in court to valid good faith claims.



to me those types of letters are just offering up excuses for bad calls and and weak management .. tying to intimidate the public .. in order to hide the truth .. or facts