Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[Johnik]

MLM, I do not wish to put words in your mouth. My whole point was that your post was not clear.

Your post:

Is that the best we can do to show he's [i.e., John Bordynuik] a liar?

no, there are much better things, such as the statement about there not being a 2nd PP (PIPE), etc, etc.....this was posted here a billion times to prove there would not be one, and also mentioned at the AGM, (right???), as the PP was taking place (or soon did after the AGM, whatever.....and people were so psyched up that some were paying more than market price for restricted shares, right???.....isn't that the story????)......

then there is this BS below, sure make it SOUNDS like the AUTOMATIC tape operation was no biggie at all.....opps, only he has the needed "clearance?"?? (or whatever)......Cambridge MA "office" (LOL!) was opened for what reason then???....oh yeah, we were told tapes can not leave the USA......so JB was going to commute to Cambridge, being the only one with "clearance"???....hire some folks from MIT, source of the HONORARY DEGREE (despite the fact MIT does not give them).....now they are back to a Canadian office, with Cambridge shut down after the photo opps.....it goes on and on, a story with more holes than a sieve.......

My post in response:

I'm having trouble following your post MLM. Who are you saying was making BS statements? Mr. Bordynuik? Some unspecified message board poster? A compilation of public commentary?

It appears that you are claiming that Bordynuik proclaimed at the AGM that there would not be a second or subsequent private placement (i.e., "PP" or "PIPE"). Are you sure about that? The only mention of private placements that I recall at the AGM was someone's (Baldwin, I think) statement that the possibility of future PPs depends on the company's operations and revenue stream. I do recall him saying that if revenues were sufficient, the company would not do a PP, but I also recall him saying that he could not rule out the possibility of a future PP.

Secondly, what are these "BS" Cambridge "photo opps" you speak of? What glamorous photos were ever taken at the Cambridge office? If you are talking about that video you posted, it doesn't appear to have been recorded at the Cambridge office. Am I wrong about that?

If your discontent centers on something some other message board poster stated about this company, then in fairness you should make that fact clear. Otherwise your post has the appearance of chastising JBI for staging a mock photo shoot and then misrepresenting at the AGM that there would be no further private placements. This is particularly true given that the "he" in the quote you are responding to refers to the company's CEO, Mr. Bordynuik. Or are you in fact claiming that Mr. Bordynuik has engaged in such behavior?

No, you never stated that the so-called "photo opps" were glamorous. But it did appear that you were suggesting that Bordynuik (JB) set up the Cambridge office for some photo opp., which, if that were the case, I would not think would have been done for junk photos. Is that what you were actually suggesting? I don't know! Again, the whole point to my response was that I did not understand your post, or what it was that you were insinuating, or who it was that you were criticizing. That is why I raised the questions I did.

As I noted, you were responding to a comment regarding the veracity of JB. It now appears that you are criticizing past message board posts. Nothing wrong with well-intentioned criticism, mind you, but you did not clarify that your focus was on message board posters, as opposed to the CEO of JBI.

All I asked for was clarity (although I'm still not sure I understand your point). I am sorry if I mischaracterized your post. It is difficult to accurately paraphrase a post that I have trouble comprehending (which, AGAIN, was my whole point).