Thursday, December 30, 2010 8:46:22 PM
How Democratic? EIU's Annual Index
by ask .. Wed Dec 29, 2010
It is year end, and The Economist Intelligence Unit has just released its bi-annual report
on the state of democracy around the world. The results, unfortunately, are not uplifting.
According to the study, a full third of the world population lives in totalitarian states - and only 12% live
in what is defined as "full democracies". The trend has been negative since the last report issued in 2008.
* ask's diary :: ::
The study measures five criteria to arrive at a compound index:
- Electoral process and pluralism - The functioning of government - Political participation - Political culture - Civil liberties
The methodology of the study is explained in the end section of the report (from page 34).
Link to full study.
Not surprisingly, the 5 Nordic countries + Australia and New Zealand form the top seven in the
ranking. At the bottom of the list are: Myanmar, Uzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Chad and North Korea.
The United States is ranked 17.
The index score determines whether a country will be characterized as:
- Full democracy - Flawed democracy - Hybrid regime - Authoritarian regime
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Only 26 nations qualify as full democracies. A disappointing finding is that several European states have fallen from the full to the flawed democracy category - this applies to France, Italy, Slovenia and Greece.
I believe most users of this blog will find it useful to have a quick look at the full report. Here's a choice quote:
Problems in the functioning of democracy in leading Western states diminish the scope for credible external democracy promotion. The US and UK are near the bottom of the "full democracy" category in our index. In the US, there has been an erosion of civil liberties related
to the fight against terrorism. Problems in the functioning of government have also become more prominent. In the UK, there has also been some erosion of civil liberties, but the main feature is an exceptionally low level of political participation across all dimensions—voting turnout,
membership of political parties and willingness to engage in and attitudes to political activity.
Although almost one-half of the world’s countries can be considered to be democracies, in our index the number of "full democracies" is low, at only 26 countries; 53 countries are rated as "flawed democracies". Of the remaining 88 countries in our index, 55 are authoritarian and 33 are
considered to be "hybrid regimes". As could be expected, the developed OECD countries dominate among full democracies, although there are two Latin American countries, one east European country and one African country, which suggests that the level of development is not a binding
constraint. Only two Asian countries are represented: Japan and South Korea.
Have a look at the full report!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/12/29/932160/-How-Democratic-EIUs-Annual-Index
Sadly the world's no 1 democracy is no more. If the general population had more to spend, demand goes
up, so more jobs. It seems to me the USA would have a stronger economy and a more vibrant
democracy if more of the supra wealthy accepted the social philosophy of Buffett and Gates.
And, if the US had a system of universal healthcare, with no nexus between employment and cover, a higher minimum wage, a safer system of unemployment insurance, and a new ethic in business which would include a desire to give jobs to American's over the maximum profit motive.
It's not asking too much.
by ask .. Wed Dec 29, 2010
It is year end, and The Economist Intelligence Unit has just released its bi-annual report
on the state of democracy around the world. The results, unfortunately, are not uplifting.
According to the study, a full third of the world population lives in totalitarian states - and only 12% live
in what is defined as "full democracies". The trend has been negative since the last report issued in 2008.
* ask's diary :: ::
The study measures five criteria to arrive at a compound index:
- Electoral process and pluralism - The functioning of government - Political participation - Political culture - Civil liberties
The methodology of the study is explained in the end section of the report (from page 34).
Link to full study.
Not surprisingly, the 5 Nordic countries + Australia and New Zealand form the top seven in the
ranking. At the bottom of the list are: Myanmar, Uzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Chad and North Korea.
The United States is ranked 17.
The index score determines whether a country will be characterized as:
- Full democracy - Flawed democracy - Hybrid regime - Authoritarian regime
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Only 26 nations qualify as full democracies. A disappointing finding is that several European states have fallen from the full to the flawed democracy category - this applies to France, Italy, Slovenia and Greece.
I believe most users of this blog will find it useful to have a quick look at the full report. Here's a choice quote:
Problems in the functioning of democracy in leading Western states diminish the scope for credible external democracy promotion. The US and UK are near the bottom of the "full democracy" category in our index. In the US, there has been an erosion of civil liberties related
to the fight against terrorism. Problems in the functioning of government have also become more prominent. In the UK, there has also been some erosion of civil liberties, but the main feature is an exceptionally low level of political participation across all dimensions—voting turnout,
membership of political parties and willingness to engage in and attitudes to political activity.
Although almost one-half of the world’s countries can be considered to be democracies, in our index the number of "full democracies" is low, at only 26 countries; 53 countries are rated as "flawed democracies". Of the remaining 88 countries in our index, 55 are authoritarian and 33 are
considered to be "hybrid regimes". As could be expected, the developed OECD countries dominate among full democracies, although there are two Latin American countries, one east European country and one African country, which suggests that the level of development is not a binding
constraint. Only two Asian countries are represented: Japan and South Korea.
Have a look at the full report!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/12/29/932160/-How-Democratic-EIUs-Annual-Index
Sadly the world's no 1 democracy is no more. If the general population had more to spend, demand goes
up, so more jobs. It seems to me the USA would have a stronger economy and a more vibrant
democracy if more of the supra wealthy accepted the social philosophy of Buffett and Gates.
And, if the US had a system of universal healthcare, with no nexus between employment and cover, a higher minimum wage, a safer system of unemployment insurance, and a new ethic in business which would include a desire to give jobs to American's over the maximum profit motive.
It's not asking too much.
Jonathan Swift said, "May you live all the days of your life!"
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.