InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: navanuts post# 40550

Tuesday, 12/28/2010 11:32:20 AM

Tuesday, December 28, 2010 11:32:20 AM

Post# of 60937
As I read it, and I also could be wrong, T-Mobiles initial posturing was all about ownership of the patent. That is what forced Diac and Williamson to join the case; there was a legitimate question of whether all the real parties in interest had joined the case. Without them, the case was not ripe to proceed.

If the stipulation provided for complete "ownership" of the federal case then I see no reason for the attorneys drafting the stay to mention the state court case. It would be irrelevant. Since they did, I must believe that it has relevance to the federal court case. That is pretty much all I am saying.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.