InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 3187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

Re: gr8member post# 40539

Tuesday, 12/28/2010 10:35:37 AM

Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:35:37 AM

Post# of 60938
I have to agree with you. I don't really think the state case is a factor here. Since there has been no filing yet in Fed Court to indicate an extension past the state court trial date, I'm not sure the State case is holding anything up as far as a Tmob settlement goes. I understand the language in the stay filing, but if you read the 2008 agreement and the stipulation agreement, they both give Calypso a green light, especially the stipulation agreement. I would have expected a filing in Fed Court by now if they were requesting a stay beyond the state case. I think the judge might go for a short extension verbally, but a longer stay might require a written request of the court. They in my opinion would have known prior to the stay ending if a settlement could be reached without the outcome of the state case being known and they knew the state case was extended in Oct or Nov. So I don't see why they wouldn't have filed an extension to the stay in Fed court prior to or just after the stay expired. In a long winded comment, I don't think the state case is a factor.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.