NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[lesnshawn]

jonesieatl: You do a great service here and elsewhere connecting the YA dots but your post here, really? You really expect the particulars of a company's dealings (this is a "deal" between two companies) to be publicly required information? You really think that announcing the particulars of a company's dealings to the world and respective company's competition to be somehow beneficial for the companies involved? You know that's not realistic so posting as though it should be is a great disservice and tarnishes your fine reputation.


We can though, with confidence, be sure of one thing...it's NOT being given away for free.

Iain: Bena, you know we are nice guys. A couple of competitors in the USA have already asked us for a free license but we can’t accept that. We are a business and so are they. In a reasonable manner at a fair price we want to move forward with this.

Bena: So you are saying that you are open to conversation but a license fee is required.

Iain:Yes. We have invested so much in this and have had battle after battle. But now we are going to power ahead and make this work. I am open to discussion and we want to be seen as fair. We want the whole mobile barcode market to succeed and the license fee model is tried and tested and it works. It can be as simple or as difficult as people want it to be and we aim to keep it simple.

We have been working very very closely with both the GSMA and the OMA by being connected the introduction of a LICENSE MODEL CAN AND WILL ONLY SUCCEED.

http://www.gomonews.com/neomedia-wins-patent-for-indirect-mobile-barcode-so-what-now/

lns

p.s. - first/last post of day

p.s.s. - OlafKjelldsen/JP...lovin' the banter

p.s.s.s. - Companies acquire IP to use it, sell it (Rothschild) or lock it up for it never see the light of day. Companies license IP to use it, period. I licensee can't lock up what's not theirs.