InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1652
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2009

Re: just_an_ant post# 155834

Thursday, 12/23/2010 8:05:20 PM

Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:05:20 PM

Post# of 241037
I'm really confused Ant, care to assist? You stated:

It is absolutely misleading imo..... Your data was dated 2008, 2006, etc. and doesn't even relate to 2010 or beyond because it is already in the 'operations' and existing potential of the present.



So you are calling my posts about new store openings from back in 2008, 2006 misleading because "it is already in the 'operations' and existing potential of the present."

But yet here you are stating something about information being WAY more relevant? How can a post be both misleading and relevant?

However, more current information (like today, yesterday, last week or last month) is likely WAY more relevant then something related to 2-4 years ago.



All PR's, news, and events lead up to present PR's, news, and events...which lead to further PR's, news and events...so no matter how far back a article is dated...it relates...it all relates...you don't need to call my wonderful DD misleading...as it is not...it is just outdated information that effects the present and the future...

All? no
Some? yes, because more current information exists and makes the 'old' information too dated and irrelevant when forward looking imo

Here you are claiming old news is not important/irrelevant...What?! Your telling me when you do research on stocks, you only go back a few weeks, as IYO, any later than that is misleading to the future events?


"You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." ~ Harvey Dent