InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,881.63
(
-0.43%
)
US TECH 100
20,449.60
(
-0.85%
)
Dow Jones
42,544.22
(
-0.07%
)
Brent Oil
73.86
(
-1.33%
)
Bitcoin
92,934.33
(
-0.48%
)
Post# of 102667
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

stockguy1234

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 6
Posts 914
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/11/2010

stockguy1234

Re: mdeskm post# 23386

Thursday, 12/23/2010 1:37:43 PM

Thursday, December 23, 2010 1:37:43 PM

Post# of 102667
yes but then the description would read- exploration/mining

also the figures were from 2009-no jungo, no Basin so what property? Oregon was not active-according to DGRI

if the money was spent on mining related activities it would have been described as such.

why make excuses for DGRI? DGRI says it is overhead so it must be overhead

you either believe management or you don't--I believe management. I believe Hollis spent the money on overhead just like Hollis said he did
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up