Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:25:34 PM
They have had initial REE results from the second hole and based on those results have sent the samples to another lab to get more accurate REE concentrations. The initial lab package they probably used did not give the necessary detection limits, therefore that is why they only reported the upper part of the second hole in this PR. What that means from the lower part of the hole is anyone's guess.
For the first hole, they report sub-economic grades of Cu (i.e., no massive sulphides) and only a brief description of the remaining part of the hole, but at least indicated the source of the anomaly. No assay results were provided, except to mention the sub-economic Cu. None of this sounds positive to me.
The wild card is the additional claims? If they were truly "claimed" yesterday before releasing the results, it would suggest something positive. Unfortunately, I do not see it in this PR... do they have another PR up their sleeve before COB?
Recent KATX News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/20/2024 11:58:38 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM