InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251720
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jbog post# 111375

Thursday, 12/23/2010 12:21:13 PM

Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:21:13 PM

Post# of 251720
Teva’s low-volume Copaxone is not Copaxone—it’s a distinct drug that required Teva to submit an NDA under the 505b2 pathway.

I’m surprised that you were hoodwinked by the spin in Teva’s PR that posits a linkage between Teva’s low-volume Copaxone NDA and NVS/MNTA’s Copaxone ANDA. In fact, no such linkage exists because these are two different drugs.

That the FDA rejected Teva’s NDA for low-volume Copaxone was fully expected by those who have done a modicum of DD on this matter. The reason rejection was expected has nothing to do with Copaxone per se; rather, rejection was expected because Teva’s data package, consisting of a single open-label trial, was pathetically weak.

Please see #msg-50939364 and #msg-51123550 for additional background info.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.