Teva’s low-volume Copaxone is not Copaxone—it’s a distinct drug that required Teva to submit an NDA under the 505b2 pathway.
I’m surprised that you were hoodwinked by the spin in Teva’s PR that posits a linkage between Teva’s low-volume Copaxone NDA and NVS/MNTA’s Copaxone ANDA. In fact, no such linkage exists because these are two different drugs.
That the FDA rejected Teva’s NDA for low-volume Copaxone was fully expected by those who have done a modicum of DD on this matter. The reason rejection was expected has nothing to do with Copaxone per se; rather, rejection was expected because Teva’s data package, consisting of a single open-label trial, was pathetically weak.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.