whitemanfromtown....you said ..." I really don't want to get bogged down here in this mire with you. Those represented values of PP investors from .30 to 2.75, OK?"
Ok, so what did the $1.52 average PPS in your post represent? Talk about skewed numbers! Why did you leave out PP investors that paid $3.25 a share? Or did you even know about that? It would have been to your advantage because you could have posted...
"Maybe do the math here:
3.25 + .30= 3.55~2=1.77 would mean an average pps. You seem to have a tendency of leaving out critical values when you try to prove a point rottenapple, do the math."
No matter, the truth is, like your original numbers, the numbers I posted above have nothing to do with nothing. You have yet to give a rational answer about anything I've brought up. And you have totally avoided the question as to whether or not you're an insider or if you own PP shares.