InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 1651
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/18/2010

Re: Bansky post# 19369

Tuesday, 12/21/2010 9:13:43 AM

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:13:43 AM

Post# of 75593
SR, no doubt there is a difference. My point is they're conducting a geo survey. They will take samples, no? Of course they will. They've said as much via PR, and those samples will be assayed, and then they can either report in a table or plotted on a grid, etc. (as shown in the examples I listed). Alluvial mining might be a different breed when it comes to actual "mining," but a geo survey is a geo survey. I would expect to see lab results, and if not, then I would raise an eyebrow. And in response to your post last night...

So in less than 2 weeks 50 Galamseys will push up their pants and mud sling. Some 'production'.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=57977015



...I personally don't care if they use 50 flying Frenchmen, as long as they can extract gold in a profitable manner.

As for the manual method you describe, I'd just like to add that there are more modern, automated, mechanical means of extraction and separation.
EDIT: I didn't see your other reply, but yes, you're correct they do use dredging equipment as well. Thanks.

Re: the KA*X board, been there over a year and I'm a mod and so I'm well aware of what's going on (even have a nice big 'sticky')...but yes, you're correct there is a difference in the two methods, but some things remain the same.

BTW, thanks for the feedback. Have a great day.

~Bio