InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252590
Next 10
Followers 831
Posts 120032
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: elmono post# 9112

Sunday, 03/20/2005 4:26:25 PM

Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:26:25 PM

Post# of 252590
Re: Separate EMEA documents on antithrombin and bioequivalence:

Thanks, Elmono. The sections of the antithrombin document most relevant to ATryn are 2.1.1 and 2.2. As far as I know, GTCB has complied with all of the listed requirements, especially the requirement that the number of studied patients be >=12. (GTCB submitted efficacy data for 14 patients and safety data for an even larger number.)

Regarding the bioequivalence document you cited in #9106, I do not find anything unusual or surprising there. The document does convey the immense complexity of bringing a new protein drug to market, but I think most readers of this board are aware of that.

These documents do not alter my assessment of a 75% chance of no new clinical trials for ATryn as part of the EMEA’s review. I’d be interested in your own evaluation of this. Regards, Dew

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.