Grapefruit USA Inc (GPFT)

[BuyMyAsk]

WRONG! One DOES come before the other.

If a CLAIM is made it needs to be proven to be accurate or it is just a CLAIM.

In the case of IMGG and shareholders the device needs to be proven to work before it is proven to not work.

IMGG owes it to shareholders to PROVE the machine works because shareholders took on financial risk by purchasing shares of the company.

The machine doesn't have to be proven to not work by ANYONE, because the outsiders bare NO financial risk what-so-ever.

The people who would prove it doesn't work don't have anything at stake. The people who should prove it works have much at stake.

Which side has the financial risk? The shareholders. Therefore the machine should be PROVEN to work for their sake - not the other way around. What do the people with no financial risk care about proving that the machine doesn't work?

In other words the people putting up the financial risk need to prove it works before the people who have no financial risk (they could care less) prove that it doesn't work.


If I can't prove it doesn't work - but I have no financial risk - WHO CARES?

If you can't prove it works - and have financial risk - JOKES ON YOU!