InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 3499
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2003

Re: Stock post# 9259

Thursday, 12/16/2010 5:21:38 PM

Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:21:38 PM

Post# of 60138
Are you suggesting to run away from this stock... or that this stock will be a run away stock...it is interesting that the bigger companies that looked at it in the 1990s did so when it was part of a protected wilderness area and when gold was under $400/oz... and even then, apparently it justified some drilling exploration and indicated enough mineralization to get a previous junior exploration company interested for a few years while gold was at 800/oz and they quit because there was insufficient low hanging fruit they could find...but not because there was no gold... they saw it as subject to possible political problems from environmentalists and a bigger project than they wanted to work on...again, when gold was 800/oz...

This claim has interesting history and the stock should be worth something if there are developers that are promoting by spending the money for the promised 43 101, spending on maintaining the claim... spending on paying lawyers to do the filings and spending on other infrastructure to bring this along...

Getting this into a working mine could take a long time and may never happen, but the claim has significant value if they can do the early development work, get the Canadian authorities to release the trading ban, and find an interested partner...

If they just file a good 43101, that is going to bring substantial buying here and the stock should appreciate...IMO