InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 2006
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2000

Re: extelecom post# 15660

Thursday, 12/16/2010 3:57:15 PM

Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:57:15 PM

Post# of 16741
extelecom, ... "what's your take on why there would be an attorney change at this time"

There are many possibilities why an attorney is changed. Explaining some of them would just demonstrate how unrelated to the original plea agreement they could be.

However, this was not a motion by Amador to withdraw for a stated reason. This was not a statement by Matt that he wanted to or had fired or terminated Amador. This was a motion by the Government to have Amador disqualified.

Since I have no idea why the Government filed the motion to disqualify Amador, I decline to speculate here as to why this unusual motion was filed.

But, here's a couple of articles on disqualifying attorneys. I am not suggesting that they are the same reasons Amador was removed:

http://www.federalcriminaldefenseblog.com/2010/08/articles/miscellaneous/inhouse-counsel-to-the-mob-court-denies-governments-motion-to-disqualify-attorney-joseph-corozzo-jr/

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-01-24-1607819902_x.htm ... eom

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.