Cotton & Western Mining Inc. (CWRN)

[microcaps1]

Normally,inspections would not occur without a permit,let alone 5 inspections. If he didn't have a required permit,he would be so told at the first inspection and certainly have it by now.

There's a lot of misdirection employed re this permit.
The land usage was approved years ago-that's the tough part -when public hearings are usually held and there is an environmental review and many govt agencies,including environmental,sign off on the land usage before the land usage is so zoned.
Concomitantly,CWRN or predecessor obtained mining concession-all done long ago.

In western countries which recognize private property rights and legal doctrines,once company has expended funds in reliance on land usage and concession,any further permitting is a matter of red tape and bonding as has been noted before.

Its ridiculous to imply some problem re this permit when the land usage and the mining concession(the 2 tough hurdles)were accomplished years ago.
Any subsequent permit is just to make sure streams /river are not unduly fouled by construction/production activity. This is not a big hurdle as implied by some.