LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I'm not sure why you can't understand that the transaction as a whole, HAS NOT COMPLETED YET?
Do you think that everytime a reporting company puts a deposit down on a deal (THAT IS NOT YET COMPLETED much less entered LOI STAGE...OR MOA.....)needs to file an 8k?
Drop all the other rhetoric for one second...and let's see an answer on that.
It is a simple question.
What the two of you are missing is that regardless of how this deal was structured...security regs do not change to suit deals.
This deal from what we see in the latest filings is not yet completed....the deal could fall flat...get cancelled...hell the terms of the deal could change....ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE UNTIL IT CLOSES!
So what pray tell is it about this yet to be completed deal, that has only a deposit on file, that drives you to think an 8k is required?
Do you think the officers of the company did not seek legal counsel as to filings required?
You are talking about a once a filer always a filer scenario...the fact they are currently pink does not relinquish their requirement to file.
SO INSTEAD OF POKING ME IN THE EYE because you believe I do not understand your opinion.....given the fact an 8k has not accompanied this newest revelation......in your own words explain precisely in detailed terms why the officers of the company are negligent (let's face it...if you are correct then that is what you are saying right)
Leave me and my opinion out of it and try and explain precisely why, in point form they are negligent.
Then we can discuss what it is SHOULD or should NOT be done about it.
Frankly I think, the two of you are trying to make the rules/regs suit your debate...without having any information of substance to promulgate your side of the debate....but thats just my opinion....so far your opine is all I have seen.......try posting something factual.
As to what rights this license is to include and for what regions geographically speaking....where is your confusion there?
You do understand that technology licenses carry territorial rights that up to and including date of deals closing for specific regions....MIGHT CHANGE?
The ramifications of such changes can unilaterally have huge ramifications to the deal itself?
So where again is the need for the 8k to state what at this time?
I await your thorough well thought out response.
