The posts are negative Danny, for precisely the reasons that you gave. Me and some others are convinced that CDEX is nothing more than a continuation of LOCH.. and the track record of CDEX so far is NOT reassuring in any way that we are wrong. There is really nothing that can truthfully be said about CDEX so far that is positive.
Speaking for myself, I do not wish to see CDEX get away with just running out the clock on the Statutes of Limitations of the LOCH wrong-doing. Not without some heat applied. So in my small way, I apply some heat, and others that know far more about the inner workings of the SCAM than I do apply more heat that never reaches these boards.
Eventually truth will prevail. Just as it did with LOCH.. If I am wrong, I will be among the first to so post when i am proven wrong by good deeds of CDEX. So far, I have seen none..
Even those that could appear to be positive are tainted by half truths and evasive PRs and web site entries. Long on hot air, devoid of useful details.
