InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1832
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2008

Re: panmunjomi post# 81747

Wednesday, 12/08/2010 2:54:29 PM

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:54:29 PM

Post# of 103302
Fact No. 4 . Reverse splits are a sign of good things for companies on the way up, but a sign of bad things for companies on the way down.

In order to meet the minimum share price requirements for Nasdaq, many companies will conduct a reverse split. This is perfectly acceptable to the exchange, and the post-split share price will be evaluated accordingly.

Using a reverse split to raise the share price and obtain an uplisting is a very positive sign for a company and is much different than companies that use a reverse split to prevent being delisted. Once again, the confusion relates to delisting as opposed to uplisting. Many people who don't focus on uplistings only encounter reverse splits in the context of companies that are trying to stave off a delisting, so in many people's eyes a reverse split is a sign of a troubled company.

For the relative few of us focused on uplistings, a reverse split is typically the first catalyst that attracts attention to the potential uplisting and is considered a very good event.


http://www.thestreet.com/story/10725448/2/how-an-uplisting-works.html


MARK THIS POST FOR ALL WHO THINK A REVERSE SPLIT IS BAD

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.