Sunday, December 05, 2010 12:02:05 PM
I have cosidered it a complete conflict of interest when IM or LM or whomever claims to be taking on the fudiciary responsibility to shareholders ( which simply means adding value to the pps) and in the next breath claim that a rising sp is detrimental to the company. How can this NOT be a conflict.
Yes I have questioned how can this be legal too along with a few other questionable actions.
IM can run all he wants - LM can dance all she wants
The board can manipulate all they want
But one day the piper will come calling and we will watch them all dance together IMO
Let the music begin !!!
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM