In paragraph 4 of exhibit A to the Chamberlain Declaration it states:
“To the best of my knowledge, I was the only equity analyst who covered litigation participation securities.”
But in paragraph 15 we see the following “hedge”:
“My work in this matter is ongoing. and I reserve the right to amend my report and may modify, refine, or revise my opinions if new information comes to light or in light of other discovery or expert testimony.”
So, where are these other “experts” going to come from that might change her opinion? I thought she was the only one…And if “new information” or “discovery” comes to light at this stage of the game that might change her opinion, wouldn’t that be an admission that her client (WMI) failed to provide all of the relevant documentation upon which she would base her determination? Please, lets have these other “experts”, “new information” and “discovery” come to light sooner rather than later.
