Monday, November 29, 2010 11:20:03 PM
If it was an inter partes reexam, we would know the requester. We will likely never know that for this anonymous, non-participant, ex parte reexam. That is the intention.
Requesters can file the request anonymously. This is done for any number of reasons, but it can be for positive reasons. For instance, a potential licensee wants to have the patent office review concerning prior art before they invest in the patent. The anonymity allows the requester not to worsen an existing situation or tip their hand.
It serves no purpose to guess. It simply does not matter.
And for those that insist nothing is real if they have to search Google themselves, start here: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3523355/Reexamination-as-a-Limited-Alternative.html
“It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us into trouble. It’s the things we know that just ain’t so.” Henry Wheeler Shaw
Maybacks Global Entertainment and ZEASN Technology Private Ltd. Sign Global Licensing Agreement • AHRO • Aug 8, 2024 7:00 AM
SANUWAVE Will Host a Conference Call on August 13, 2024 at 8:30 AM (ET) to Present Q2 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 8, 2024 6:59 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Bemax, Inc. to Sell Kona Gold, LLC • BMXC • Aug 7, 2024 10:00 AM
Btab Ecommerce Group, Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • BBTT • Aug 7, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces Preliminary Unaudited Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update • HYDI • Aug 7, 2024 8:52 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM