Monday, November 29, 2010 4:12:43 PM
1) proving the credibility of the management - I think some good work needs to be done, in communication with the company, in cleaning the reputation of our management and especially ascertaining the preferred share structure right now.
2) proving the credibility of the technology - HHO scams are a dime a dozen. Even more unfortunately, I see many of our posters here use the same arguments to defend our technology as the scammers use. We've got to elucidate the exact components that distinguish our technology (lets talk about the team of engineers/scientists that invented it, btw) somehow without deleteriously divulging any secrets. Obviously favorable dyno testing results with John Deere would be a home run hit in this game; official dyno testing has been notoriously unfriendly to our type of technology.\
Take care of these two variables, and the sky is the limit.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM