I would say that at the present time, it appears through the 2008 agreement that Calypso does owe the Daic parties money and other items possibly shares. The state court case will determine who owes who what and how much, but by making blanket statements without any supporting documents or sources to support your point, does not in my mind change anything. I appreciate differing viewpoints and would be willing to look at any information you or anyone else can provide that might reflect a different viewpoint. Just saying the Daic parties are getting the patents doesn't do it for me. That is because there is only one scenario in which they could end up with the patents. Even if Calypso loses every case they bring, the Daic parties will probably not end up with the patents. The patents in any worst case scenario, after a new case is filed by the Daic parties (not the current one) would be auctioned by the court to the highest bidder. I don't think the Daic parties have the resources to competitively bid and win. If you can tell me they have $500 million dollars available to them, then I might consider that they could win the auction, otherwise I don't see how they could get the patent. If you think otherwise give me your scenario, I just can't find one. After all, I'm here to make money on this stock not lose money. If I thought I was going to lose money, I'd be gone.
It could end up that the Daic parties owe Calypso a very large amount of money and any prior judgment would be negated by this award.
It could be that Calypso is required to pay the Daic parties based on the 2008 agreement ($2.5 million dollars) and the shares promised.
But none of the current case points to the Daic parties getting $117 million dollars and the patents.
I don't know what you are talking about with my strategy of news in a few weeks over the past 8 years, because I haven't been posting on this board that long. In fact, I've only owned Calypso stock since 2004. The kind of statements you are making here are the same as Daic made in his original case. I'd like to see some documents and sources. Otherwise I don't buy the argument. See I admit Calypso possibly owes Daic something, but Daic might now owe Calypso something.
AI
