InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1269
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2010

Re: emailjanum post# 24093

Saturday, 11/27/2010 8:32:03 PM

Saturday, November 27, 2010 8:32:03 PM

Post# of 24889
The burden of demonstrating that expert testimony is competent,
relevant and reliable rests with the proponent of the testimony.
Kumho, 526 U.S. at 147-52.
d. A trial court has wide discretion in determining the admissibility of
expert testimony. In reviewing a trial court’s decision about how
to determine reliability and admissibility of expert testimony, a
court of appeals is to apply an abuse of discretion standard.
Kumho, 526 U.S. at 152; Palmacci v. Umpierrez, 121 F.3d 781,
792 (1st Cir. 1997); Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 104 F.3d 472, 476 (1st Cir. 1997).

http://www.abiworld.org/committees/newsletters/consumer/vol7num1/Lets_Litigate.pdf

I don't have faith in the Justice System!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.