InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 77
Posts 3440
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2004

Re: lmcat post# 60477

Saturday, 11/27/2010 2:27:18 PM

Saturday, November 27, 2010 2:27:18 PM

Post# of 94785
lmcat, re: KUN

A fair point to show the revenue decrease, but not a fair point to say "no earnings". This past quarter was huge for the company, from the perspective of a turnaround on a yoy comparison.

They pulled-in a NET INCOME of 788k vs. loss of 32k; that's a pretty nice turnaround. EPS of .04 vs. loss .00

Of course one would rather see a company achieve its turnaround due to huge increase in demand for products, but a nice bump in net margins is also good.

They still have challenges ahead, but for these risky plays, getting in on the first signs of turnaround often pays handsomely. My avg is .48ish and I'll be content with a 100% gain.


Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders: Net income increased to $787,657 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to net loss of $31,924 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in net income was primarily due to the decrease of selling expenses and increase of subsidy income.

Solid DD combined with timeliness and conviction is a recipe for profits.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.