Monday, November 22, 2010 8:01:35 PM
Stunning question.
I would ask Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz how they feel about someone using their firm's name to commit fraud. Or is it corporate impersonation? Or defamation? As LAWYERS, they would have the answers.
http://www.wlrk.com/
Same question to Competitive Power Ventures, Inc. Robert Burke, General Counsel, undoubtedly knows that there is equity in a firm's good name. Any illegal act that infringes upon it is worthy of prosecution.
http://www.cpv.com/management_team.php
Let's leave Renewal Fuels, Inc. out of it because, judging from their history, they don't have the wherewithal to prosecute anything.
Look at "simple" matters such as trademark infringement. Legitimate companies release the hounds to go after the actors.
Laws broken? Prosecute or let it slide? Decisions, decisions.
IMO
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM