InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1330
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2007

Re: drfreely post# 34872

Thursday, 11/18/2010 11:12:00 AM

Thursday, November 18, 2010 11:12:00 AM

Post# of 50159
Another way forward is the reverse of the one I've been proposing for some time now: a very broad out-licensing of the high impacts, to fund development of the low-impacts.

If the Servier trial establishes an effective dosage range that is far from the dosage range that induces seizures, such a deal could happen.

The advantage of relinquishing high-impact IP to develop low-impact IP is that the low-impacts are closer to the clinic, and hence could generate profits sooner. Also, seizure risk is much lower, so low impacts have a better chance of getting FDA approval.

I don't know how they'll get there, but I think that somehow corx will find its way to profitability. Unfortunately, it is going to be still more difficult to get there without wiping out current stock-holders in the process.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News