InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,304.72
(
0.70%
)
US TECH 100
18,318.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,069.59
(
0.01%
)
Brent Oil
81.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
69,184.60
(
0.95%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ooag_long

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/10/2010

ooag_long

Re: None

Sunday, 11/14/2010 1:32:44 AM

Sunday, November 14, 2010 1:32:44 AM

Post# of 60937
Looks like there are some fundamental questions:

1.) why was the case allowed to be filed in the 333rd when it belonged in the 151st in the first place? (was it not storm that originally was responsible for this?)

2.) shall vs should vs must? who's claim is inherently being questioned here (if any)?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up