Signature Devices Inc. (SDVI)

[machias]

Why would a buyback not still be on the table?

When Ken gets the 20 million note it could buy back a good portion of the float back or even buy it all back and pocket the rest, afterall much of the money would be going right back into his own pocket and thus greatly increase the value of the remainder of his holdings. He is the majority shareholder so logic would say he wants to increase share value.

This does not take in to account the 10% royalty and his holdings in the new company. I believe Ken has done his fiduciary duty to sharholders limiting dilution as much as possible but keep the company afloat, no toxic death financing, no reverse split and produced dividend. Not sure why it is so hard for others to see this. Good times are coming.